Case Of Steve Connolly vs Roman Catholics Anglicans and Jews

Question: Discuss about the Case Of Steve Connolly vs Roman Catholics ,Anglicans and Jews. Answer: Introduction "The Man Who Sued God" (Steve Connolly vs Roman Catholics, Anglicans and Jews) is a case where Steve Connolly sues the churches for the damage inflicted on his fishing boat where the insurance claimed that it was an act of God. He sues God's earthly representatives, the churches, who are forced to give arguments against God's existence to favor him. Ultimately, Steve withdraws the suit and wins a moral case by pointing out that Insurance companies mislead people using the defense of the act of God. He suggests that those relying on the act of God as a defense; need to prove his existence first. Main body The case shows that the rule oflaw protects ordinary people against the interests of more powerful people. This particular lawsuit shows that courts do not close doors to particular people because of their frivolous suits. It shows that justice is available to everyone seeking remedies. However, therule of law is limited to some cases which show due cause and are actionable. The case by Connolly is frivolous and even damages are not enforceable. This is because the case obviously has no legal merits, and if a merit exits, they are too trivial to proceed. Recommendations The case is comical and worth following but however it has no underlying justification because it cannot have reasonable extension of the law. The issue in this case before any judge depends on how hard the judge pushes the issues. However, God cannot enter response, appear in court or even damages cannot be made against him. Consequently, such cases should only be dismissed as frivolous. Conclusion The case is strangely logical with unexpected conclusions. It raises many questions regarding the insurance companies and the remedies available for ordinary people. The case also shows that the rule of law, allows anyone to seek a remedy where possible. However, such cases with no remedies are practically impossible, wasting the courts time, hence frivolous. This case has no merits to justice or law, but just support cases which require due diligence in factual basis for any defense or claims in court. Some countries take such unnecessary arguments seriously; U.S penalizes frivolous arguments payable as court tax. References Ali, M.M, (2008) The Man Who Sued God, AZMI Associates. Ari, The Man who Sued God, Tiemout London, Not dated. Retreived from; https://www.timeout.com/london/film/the-man-who-sued-god. Nor, L., King Solomon and The Man who Sued the Wind. 22 May 2008 Ropper, M., World maddest Claims for damages.2 April 2013. Russel, J., The Man Who Sued God. Movies. 04 October 2003. Underhill, K., Man Who Sued God Appears in Earthly Court. Lowering The Bar. 11 August , 2008 retreived from;https://loweringthebar.net/2008/08/court-hearing-i.html.